Some Thoughts on the Coats-Rogers Testimony and Executive Privilege

I guess if you were the General Counsel to DNI you can put forth a reductio ad absurdum and disproving your assumption non-argument. Litt did no shed much light there.

Not publicly releasable for a number of reasons not related to privilege is sufficient explanation. REL TO __ has a corollary. But he knows that.

Source: Some Thoughts on the Coats-Rogers Testimony and Executive Privilege

Advertisements

Author: Sam Sarmad

https://samsarmad.wordpress.com/about/